What Reddit reviews say
No stars and no score — what travellers actually tell each other about all eleven campervan rental companies in New Zealand, how thin the evidence is for each, and which forum claims survive a check against the operator's own terms.
Reddit is the only one of the three sources we read for New Zealand with no score in it, and much the thinnest. Roughly thirty threads across the New Zealand and travel subreddits, a few hundred comments between them, and a span running back a decade — against more than twelve thousand Google ratings and a few thousand reviews on Trustpilot. Nobody is prompted to write any of it, and none of it can be averaged.
That is the reason to read it. Each platform catches a different moment:
- A Google review is written at the depot, prompted by the place.
- A Trustpilot review is written at home, after the final invoice has landed.
- A Reddit comment is written to answer a stranger planning the same trip — sometimes from the road, often a year or two later.
Only the last one answers a question neither rating asks: knowing what you know now, would you book them again, and what should the next person watch for?
It is also the only source here that can compare two companies in one breath, because a Google or Trustpilot reviewer rates one company, in isolation, on the day. That is the best argument for reading a forum at all. It is worth saying up front that we found it happening exactly once in this corpus.
Four things decide how much weight anything on this page deserves.
How to read this page
There is no Reddit score, and we have not invented one
It is possible to tally comments for and against and print an average to one decimal place, and that number would be fiction — precision that a few dozen comments per company cannot carry, dressed up to look like the ratings on the other two pages. Each section below says how many threads it rests on and over what years, and nothing more. Where that is two threads, we say two threads and stop.
The people posting are not the market
These subreddits skew independent, budget-conscious and heavy on planning; they are thin on the families and older travellers who make up much of the motorhome business. Budget brands are discussed many times more often than premium ones, and an operator that sells mainly through booking sites barely appears. A company with two mentions is usually not a company with a problem — it is a company whose customers do not post here. Silence is not a verdict, in either direction.
Nothing is verifiable, and it does not stay put
Comments get edited, accounts get deleted, threads get removed, and nobody's identity is checked — including a company's own staff. One enthusiastic comment is worth nothing by itself; the same specific observation, from different people, years apart, is worth a great deal. Several points below rest on a single comment, and where they do, we say so rather than letting a summary imply a chorus.
A claim about a company's terms is checkable, so we checked it
Where posters say there is no one-way fee, or that road user charges are included, we went to the operator's own published terms and say below what we found — including where the forum has it wrong, which is more often than you would hope. Everything else stays flagged as what it is: something a stranger said on the internet.
We do not quote. These comments cannot be verified now, may not exist next month, and reproducing one from memory or from a second-hand summary puts words in a real person's mouth — a risk nothing on this page justifies. Everything below is in our own words. Threads were read up to 6 August 2026, and sections are ordered by how much has actually been written about each company, because on a forum the volume of discussion is the only quantity there is.
the most discussed company in this market by a wide margin, and the least settled.
What the threads say
The discussion has never converged, and it has not moved much in ten years. It splits into two groups:
- Repeat renters who report no bad experience across several hires, vehicles in good condition and service that did what it should.
- Renters describing a fault appearing mid-trip. In the most detailed of those the complaint is less about the fault than about how long it took to reach someone who could act — though that is one account, not a pattern these threads can demonstrate.
How it sits against the ratings
Set that against them and the shape is familiar. JUCY's Trustpilot page is 2.2 from 1,093 reviews, 47% five-star and 34% one-star, and these comments fall either side of the same divide.
A few dozen comments cannot produce a distribution, so this is not a second measurement of the split. It is the same argument turning up in a place with an entirely different selection effect, which is worth more than a third platform agreeing with the first two.
Reddit does add something the ratings do not, and it is about expectation
The register that comes up repeatedly is that JUCY is fine for younger travellers, barebones, not especially comfortable. That is a description of a product rather than a complaint about a company, and it sits oddly with a range that runs from a two-berth you drive like a car to a six-berth motorhome under one brand name. Whether some of the disagreement is really about which of those the reviewer booked is not something these comments can settle — but it is the question to hold while reading them.
Note also what Reddit does not contain
The cluster that dominates the one-star third on Trustpilot — deposits, waiver excesses, administrative fees for infringements arriving weeks later — is almost absent from these threads. The likeliest explanation is timing rather than frequency: people post here while planning or shortly after getting home, and to Trustpilot once the money is gone. That is our reading of the gap rather than something the threads show, but it suggests how to use them. Reddit tells you what the trip is like. Trustpilot tells you what the bill is like.
What to check
The split implies support, not price. Establish what happens when something fails on a Sunday on the West Coast — who answers, and what they are authorised to do — before it is the thing you need to know.
the freshest run of discussion for any company here, and warm throughout.
What the threads say
Reddit reproduces the delighted half of this company's Trustpilot page, and gets to two of the same points without prompting:
- Pre-trip communication people found prompt and specific.
- Pricing they found transparent.
The complaints here are mild: a leaking sunroof one family taped up themselves, a touchscreen that failed on the last day. Nobody's trip was spoiled.
The claim we checked, and it half checks out
The pricing point is the checkable one.
- Included. Road user charges genuinely are included on Wendekreisen's diesel rentals rather than added at the end, along with bedding, kitchen kit and airport transfers — one of the few "included" claims on any of these pages that survives contact with the operator's own terms.
- Not included. The insurance cover, which their published rate conditions list as a compulsory daily charge on top of the rate.
"No hidden fees", as the threads put it, is true of road user charges and untrue of the total. Price the cover in before comparing.
What matters is what Reddit does not show
Trustpilot's 4.1 comes from 39 reviews of which 28% are one-star, and that quarter is consistent about electrical and heating faults, and about being talked through diagnosing the problem over several days rather than being given another van. Reddit does not refute that and should not be read as refuting it: someone whose heater has failed in a cold shoulder-season week is writing to Trustpilot for redress, not to a travel forum to help the next traveller. The published warning stands. Reddit only suggests why it would be invisible here.
What to check
For a winter or shoulder-season booking, heating is the specific thing to ask about — what kind it is, whether it runs away from mains power, and what happens if it stops.
enthusiastic, and nothing substantial since 2023.
What the threads say
The praise is for value and for support, which is what Trustpilot's 4.5 from 434 reviews praises too. The caveat comes from the same commenters: these are small, spartan vehicles with basic fittings, and at least one notes the vans look their age while reporting no trouble with them. The fuller version of that trade-off — ageing vans, no mechanical trouble across both islands — belongs to Trustpilot's reviewers and is covered in that round-up.
This is the one place on this page where a forum does what no rating platform can
A single comment puts Spaceships next to JUCY, gives JUCY the edge on comfort, and says Spaceships' support was good. That is one comment, it does not claim JUCY's support was worse, and it would not survive as evidence on its own. It is worth pointing at anyway, because it is the shape of comparison that a review form structurally cannot produce: nobody rating one company on one platform ever writes that sentence.
The claims we checked
- "Self-containment." The threads get loose about this, and it is the most consequential detail in this fleet: self-containment is not a Spaceships feature, it is a Spaceships model. Today three of the company's five models (the Beta 2S, the Sigma and the VW Cosmo) are listed as certified and two are not, and the green warrant that rental vans have needed since 7 December 2024 requires a fixed toilet. This is not a comfort difference, it is a legal one about where you may spend the night. Book the model, not the brand.
- "No one-way fee." Correct — there is no repositioning charge between the two depots. Auckland and Christchurch sit on different islands, though, so a one-way still carries a Cook Strait vehicle fare that no rental policy covers.
Weigh the date range
Nothing substantial since 2023 means the fleet impressions here are ageing even where the verdict holds.
multi-week rentals, none of which went wrong.
What the threads say
Reddit lines up with Google rather than with Trustpilot. What these threads describe is unremarkable in the best sense: long rentals with nothing going wrong, clean vans, staff people found responsive.
How it sits against the ratings
That matters because of what sits beside it. This company's Trustpilot page is 2.1 from 14 reviews with no five-star reviews at all, and the round-up for that platform already published the hypothesis that the page is where an unhappy tail collects rather than a representative sample. Reddit is a third sample, biased differently again and prompted by nobody, and it supports that reading. Three sources, three selection effects:
- 691 Google depot ratings that are strongly positive.
- Four Reddit threads that agree with them and are far too few to weigh.
- Fourteen Trustpilot reviews that do not.
It does not clear the company and should not be read that way. The pattern on Trustpilot is serious mechanical failure partway through a trip followed by a dispute over who pays — a low-probability, high-cost failure, and a handful of good three-week trips cannot rule that out. The thing to check is unchanged: what the agreement says about liability when a failure is not your fault.
The headline rate is not the whole rate
Reddit raises this and the ratings never do. Our own equipment record for this company says the same in more detail:
- Bedding and a cooking kit come with the campervan models, but the living-equipment charge on those models is mandatory rather than optional.
- The Stationwagon includes no bedding.
- The Stationwagon has no kitchen: a gas cooker and cooking gear come only with its optional NZ$45 camping-equipment pack. (The Chubby, by contrast, has a kitchenette with a gas cooker and a sink.)
Read the inclusions before setting a daily figure against anyone else's.
One confusion worth clearing up, because it recurs whenever these companies get listed together: Travellers Autobarn is not a thl brand. It is an independent Australian operator, trading since 1993 and running New Zealand depots since 2016, with no connection to Britz, Maui or Apollo.
Its terms restrict travel to sealed roads and short well-maintained access roads, and unsealed use voids the cover and triggers a breach fee — but that is close to universal here rather than a mark against this company. Nearly every New Zealand rental agreement restricts unsealed roads, and every camper we price in this market is flagged as not cleared for them.
five or six comments, all admiring, spread across a decade.
What the threads say
Five or six comments is a small pile of evidence, and consistency is not something that few can claim. What makes them worth reading is the span: the same verdict from different people ten years apart is a different kind of signal from the same verdict inside one busy month, and it is not something a rating snapshot can show at all. The direction matches the numbers, which are strong on both platforms — 4.8 from 186 reviews is the highest Trustpilot score in this market, and 4.9 from 657 on the Auckland depot listing on Google is beaten only by Big Little Campers' much smaller 5.0.
The praise is for the vehicles, which are German-built, and for a company repeat renters keep going back to.
Posters supply the caveat themselves
More usefully than the praise, they say plainly and unprompted that this is the expensive end of the market and not the choice for a budget trip — the qualification the ratings pages have to attach from outside. On the other two round-ups it had to be supplied by us. Here the reviewers supply it themselves, which is the more honest version of it.
Two claims need trimming before you plan around them
- Onboard connectivity is a paid extra chosen at booking, not something included.
- The concierge story — the company handling ferry bookings and reshaping an itinerary — traces to a single account. Ferry tickets can be added to a booking, but treat that version as one person's experience rather than a service level you are buying.
A third needs taking to the contract rather than repeating
Wilderness is described in these threads as the operator without hidden restrictions on where you may drive, and it is more permissive than most — it publishes no blacklist of roads, and ordinary conservation-campsite access is not treated as out of bounds. That is not the same as an exemption.
What gets excluded in this market is defined by condition and signage as much as by road name — beaches, water crossings, roads signposted as unsuitable for a vehicle that size, and roads rough enough to damage one — and no camper we price here, this one included, is flagged as cleared for the roads that are actually restricted. If a specific gravel road is load-bearing for your route, get it confirmed in writing rather than from a thread.
favourable, and far too thin to carry a verdict.
Half a dozen comments is thinner than the fourteen-review Trustpilot page this site already refused to draw a conclusion from. It is worth something all the same, because Trustpilot has nothing at all for this company — an unclaimed profile with no reviews on it — so these threads are the first narrative evidence of any kind we hold. Read none of it as a rating.
Be precise about what they contain
People saying they had chosen the company, rather than trip reports written afterwards. We did not find a completed account.
The claim we checked
The one practical point that recurs is one-way hires between the two depots without a drop fee, and that does check out against the company's own material — though it is unremarkable, since Spaceships and Wendekreisen advertise the same thing, and as with them the Cook Strait fare for the vehicle is yours regardless.
Two descriptions we are not repeating, because nothing supports them: that the operation is family-run, and that its pricing is all-inclusive.
What the equipment record does show is worth more than either
Heating varies by model, and the 240-volt version only works at a powered site:
- The Little One and The Big One — a plug-in 240-volt heater.
- The Biggest One — an interior diesel heater.
On a shoulder-season trip that is a difference between two vehicles, not a footnote, and it is the thing to check rather than assume.
Where this company is actually evidenced is Google
5.0 from 269 reviews on the Auckland depot listing, the highest average held by any operator in this market. Read that. This section is a footnote to it.
barely discussed, and what there is is logistics rather than experience.
What the threads say
The content amounts to three things:
- Where you can pick up and drop off.
- An observation that Britz costs more than the budget brands.
- One account of a thl-brand rental that went fine, with add-ons to watch for.
That is positioning, not evidence — and the positioning needs a correction of its own, because costing more than the budget end is not the same as being the premium tier. Britz sits mid-market; Maui is thl's premium line.
Two thin sources agree there is little to say
Trustpilot has six reviews and disclaims itself; Reddit has two threads and should be at least as modest. On both round-ups the honest answer is the same: Britz's evidence base is Google, where its two largest New Zealand depot listings carry over a thousand reviews each and both sit at 4.2.
Reddit does make one contribution nothing else here does — the family map
Britz, Maui, Mighty and Apollo share an owner in Tourism Holdings Limited, and knowing that explains two things a ratings page never will:
- Why a complaint aimed at "thl" can surface in a thread nominally about one of its brands and still be about the group.
- Why choosing between Britz and Maui is a question about fleet and tier rather than about two independent companies.
What these threads never discuss is the thing that most distinguishes Britz here, which is its four-wheel-drive range. Given how much New Zealand route planning runs into unsealed-road restrictions, that is a gap in the discourse rather than a signal about the company — with the caveat the company's own contract makes, that four-wheel drive widens the set of permitted roads and does not delete the excluded-roads list.
critical, and not corroborated by the ratings.
Be exact about the size of this, because it is smaller than it first reads. It is one commenter's poor experience with thl support, plus that same commenter's second-hand report that other Maui renters had said the same. Neither says which stage of the rental was involved.
How it sits against the ratings
It cannot be weighed against what sits beside it:
- 381 Trustpilot reviews at 4.1.
- Over three thousand Google ratings across its three depots — part of the largest body of evidence about any company in this market, the Auckland listing alone accounting for 1,451 of them at 4.5.
Whatever those two threads are, they are not a verdict.
They are not a contradiction either, and the reason generalises past this company. Maui's positive reviews are overwhelmingly about depot execution: efficient pickup and drop-off, staff who know the vehicle, motorhomes that arrive clean and presented. A complaint about support reaching you slowly is about a different stage of the same rental, and it is a stage almost nobody reviews, because the form is filled in at or shortly after the counter. Two sources can be describing the same company accurately and never meet.
What to check
Convert it into a check rather than a verdict, and make the check narrow. Ask what the after-hours line is authorised to do — swap the vehicle, pay for a night's accommodation, send someone — rather than whether support is good.
One more thing these threads supply is a mechanism
within thl, Maui carries the newer vehicles. That is one commenter's framing rather than a fact we can check. Nothing in the ratings contradicts it.
warm, and the smallest sample on this page.
Two threads is thinner evidence than Britz's six-review Trustpilot page, which this site already called six anecdotes with an average printed on top — and Waka Campa does not even have that, since no Trustpilot listing exists under its own name. Nothing in this section is a verdict, and it would be dishonest to present it as one.
What the threads say
- Nothing went wrong.
- The van was spotless.
- The operation felt personal rather than processed.
- Pickup and drop-off were flexible across three cities.
The claims we checked
Both checkable ones hold up from the company rather than from the forum:
- Self-containment. The three Explorers carry a fixed flush toilet and an outdoor shower, the newer Outrider adds an indoor cold shower, and all four models are listed as certified self-contained under the green-warrant rules rental vans have followed since 7 December 2024. Certification is what council sites that require it ask for — it is not a general permission, since freedom camping here remains site by site.
- Three cities. It operates from Auckland, Christchurch and Queenstown.
What we have dropped is the price talk
Two comments positioned this company in opposite directions relative to the larger brands, neither had anything behind it, and where an operator sits on price is a question for the live bands rather than for a forum.
The evidence that does carry this company is current and still being added to
its Auckland and Christchurch depot listings on Google, both at 4.8. That is more than can be said for the only Trustpilot listing connected to the business, which is filed under a predecessor brand and untouched since 2019.
and its only content is a corporate fact: Apollo and Maui share an owner in thl, with Maui carrying the newer fleet.
No first-hand account of an Apollo rental in New Zealand surfaced anywhere in this search. Reddit's traveller mix skews towards smaller and cheaper vehicles, so the silence is at least as likely to be about who posts here as about the company. We cannot show which, and the honest reading is that it tells you nothing either way.
One guardrail is worth repeating, because it is the most common Apollo error and it turns up in search results and in review write-ups alike:
apollorv.com, rated 1.7 and heavily ranked, is the United States business.apollocamper.com, rated 4.1 from 252 reviews, is the company that rents campervans in New Zealand — roughly a quarter of those reviews trace to the three New Zealand depots.
The American number describes a different operation on the other side of the Pacific. Do not carry it into a New Zealand decision.
Apollo is evidenced on the other two round-ups rather than on this one — and on the Google page in particular, where the gap between its depots is the story.
We could not find a single first-hand account of renting from Campervan Village anywhere in the New Zealand, Australia or travel subreddits.
The company's URL appeared once, in a 2020 r/sydney thread about car rentals for young drivers on provisional licences, listed alongside five other companies with no commentary attached. That is the entire Reddit record.
The absence is worth noting alongside its sister brand
Wicked Campers, sharing ownership, depots and fleet, has substantial Reddit discussion under its own name. Campervan Village draws none — which most likely reflects the brand's smaller footprint rather than anything Reddit can tell you about the rental itself.
The company is evidenced on the other two round-ups, where the signal is consistent: low Google depot ratings on a very thin sample, a polarised Trustpilot listing, and bond refund delays as the dominant complaint on both.
Compare prices across all vendors
See real-time availability and pricing from every campervan rental company in New Zealand.
Search all vendors